I always rest the idea that once closed the front door, no one has the right to spy through the keyhole or through a wiretap or in any other way. The political
Marrazzo had good chances to reconfirm its governor of Lazio.
he liked sex less "conventional" did not know hardly anyone. The electorate chose him, maybe he would have confirmed, because he thought of him as a good administrator and politician. The journalist
Marrazzo would continue to do his job as a journalist in RAI if they had not discovered his "weak" in intimacy.
he liked sex less "conventional" did not know hardly anyone. The public liked him and followed him, and would continue to do so because they saw him as a serious professional, who in his work it would take skill and passion, and the results were positive.
...
One day, however, the front pages of newspapers have discovered that the journalist, the politician Marrazzo "was going to cross."
Suddenly it was no longer credible nor a politician nor as a journalist, hit her professionalism and reliability administrator and a man of "average" evaporates.
...
I still do not understand what can change, and why, in the mind of a voter, a reader, a viewer to discover that its referent istituzionale, che pure da sempre come personaggio "pubblico" ha sempre dimostrato valore, nella vita privata segue pratiche lontane dal pensare comune, dalle rigide norme della tradizione benpensante di questo bel suolo italico vatican-pervaso.
Ho letto che c'è chi ha il coraggio di dire cose di una ovvietà sconvolgente: "io credo che fare affari con i mafiosi sia reato, non andare a trans. Per quello, deve rendere conto solo alla moglie, (...) , e ai figli." .
Perchè non è vero che una persona, solo per essere un personaggio pubblico deve perdere il suo diritto ad avere una vita privata. Il che non significa che se Marrazzo, o Mele, o Lapo, spacciano cocaina durante i loro festini non devono essere pursued by the law, but if they do things at home other than that it is "normal" (depending on which convention, then you do not understand) do, because this should be a matter of interest?
Man "public" must be known until the last speck of knowledge only matters relating to his public role. What goes beyond this, because it must potentially be disclosed?
Strange that so many are those who snort of annoyance and enough to see the shrines covered with gossip magazines, because who cares if the Crown puts the bags of Belen in the street ... And though the hole in the wall of the house because we put a politician's public persona is automatically giusto che perda la sua privacy.
Tanto lo sappiamo tutti che questo non è sempre vero: dipende da chi è il politico (che ci sta sul caxxo) da condannare alla gogna mediatica.
Perchè anche con bavaglio e port-it gialli, la legge resta uguale per tutti, e per altri, no.
